Our Only Hope For Better Policy Is A More Informed Electorate
Published October 01, 2008
Robert Rubin, the Vice Chairman of Citigroup, former CEO of Goldman Sachs, and the former Treasury Secretary under Bill Clinton, made what I believe to be a vitally important point the other week on the PBS interview show Charlie Rose (24:10 minutes).
His point was, in essence: "To improve policy in America we need a more informed electorate."
Rubin made this simple but important point specifically with respect to economic policy, but I believe it applies to all policy. We can complain all we want about having poor leaders in Washington, pointless wars, a mess of an economy, the deteriorating environment, inadequate health care, and expensive energy, but at the end of the day it is our own problem — we, the electorate, are responsible.
Perhaps fifty years ago, one could have argued our leaders needed to decide what was best for the American people because the American people could not hope to educate themselves sufficiently to make their own decisions. Today, because of television and the Internet, access to information should no longer be a barrier. And we should be using this information to hold our leaders to account.
So why doesn't this happen? I believe there are two principle causes:
1. Major policy issues are complicated and there are few media outlets that cover them with sufficient depth to promote real understanding.
2. Many people still do not believe they can personally make a difference.
If we can do a better job with the education portion, I believe this will also alleviate a great deal of the apathy and cynicism often felt by the American people toward the US government, as they begin to see that their educated opinions can indeed have tremendous impact on the world in which they live.
The Best of Today's Information for the Electorate
I think it's safe to assume most Americans receive their policy education primarily from the media - TV, Internet, and newspapers. Sadly, today's 24/7 news media and five minute YouTube video format falls well short of informing anyone with sufficient depth to form complete policy opinions. But there is hope — several media outlets have begun to produce higher quality interviews and articles that actually allow people to get their heads around difficult issues and are accessible to the general public.
Charlie Rose
Charlie Rose has been the host of the eponymous interview show on PBS for the past 15 years. During this period, arguably no other show has had a more diverse and higher quality set of guests: heads of state, religious leaders, artists, authors, academics, businesspersons, scientists, and young leaders. Mr. Rose's balanced and thoughtful questions, combined with the hour-long format, make it possible for guests to elaborate on their expertise in a way that enables the audience to develop a significantly deeper understanding of the topic than might otherwise be possible watching CNN or reading USA Today. The Charlie Rose website contains all 15 years of interviews and is completely free. In my opinion, it is one the greatest information resources on the Internet.
- Our Only Hope For Better Policy Is A More Informed Electorate
- Published: October 01, 2008
- Type: Opinion
- Section: Politics
- Filed Under: Politics: Government, Politics: Elections and Candidates, Culture: Media, Culture: Education, Politics: Policy
- Writer: Jeremy Gin
- Jeremy Gin's BC Writer page
- Jeremy Gin's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
3. Even if all this information was made readily available to the American people, the vast majority of them would be too dumb, complacent or uncaring to do anything with it. Being an American is too easy. No matter who you vote for or what they do, the average American remains fat and happy. Until something bad happens nobody pays any attention. Maybe global financial meltdown will wake them up.
I wrote a piece on this subject on July 11. It's still and always will be true.
GACDKR - I think it's dangerous to conflate a lack of education with lack of ability, and similarly, I think it is very cynical to believe the average American cannot understand public policy better than many members of the House. I strongly believe if we give people the tools to understand the world around them, and imbue them with the belief that they can make a difference, they will surprise us all with their comprehension and engagement. The global financial crisis could be a great opportunity to shake up people's lives and let them see the importance of understanding the world around them.
OK, maybe I was being a bit too cynical. :)
The point though is that most Americans don't suffer from a lack of information, they suffer from a lack of giving a crap about the information.
All the above sources that you cite are excellent places to go to gain in depth knowledge of the issues facing us today.
In order for it to do any good, somebody that isn't already paying attention needs to start.
If we could get a majority of the populace to even occasionally watch the national and international news and maybe every so often read a newspaper article it would be a big improvement.
There are people out there who are interested and they could genuinley benefit from your list of sources.
I am cautiously optimistic that recent events will hit close enough to home that a few more of us will actually make the effort.
Note: I am not actually hoping that things will get worse, just hoping that maybe they are already bad enough to affect a positive change.
GACDKR - I think you're right that people need to care about the information in order for it to be useful, but I also think part of problem is educating people on why they should care. Perhaps it is just my experience, but I find that apathetic people who end up learning about an issue (through force of school or otherwise) end up actually caring much more than they thought they ever would.
A separate problem is finding good information - many people in the US get their news from CNN, Fox News, USA Today, or their local newspaper or news channel. I would argue these news sources are part of the problem. They make people feel like the sound bite is all there is to know about major issues and the important news is whether Palin's kid is really her daughter's, instead of focusing on the importance of funding the future of Medicare. If we could have more quality educational news programs, I do think some people would pay attention, tell their friends, and we could begin to engage and educate many of the people who are apathetic today.
If we could get a majority of the populace to even occasionally watch the national and international news and maybe every so often read a newspaper article it would be a big improvement.
It would if we could get them to retrieve their news from anyone outside the American mainstream media. One of the best news sources is Al-Jazeera. Perhaps some would say I am un-American for thinking that way. I submit that it is quite THE American thing to do - "doveryai, no proveryai". If you don't know the phrase, look it up, it should be this nation's motto.





Your title says it all.
There's a lot of information out there, and it's also important to dig deeper than the surface. You never know what you might find.